ADDITIONAL NOTIFICATION OF QUOTING PRICE OF LAND
24 กุมภาพันธ์ 2543
Ref. TP-MT/026/43 (FC023/43)
23 February 2000
Subject: Additional Notification of Rationale for Quoting Selling Price of
Land Plot
Attention: Director and Manager
SET
References: 1.SET's letter no. BJ.2315/2542 dated 8 December 1999
2.THIP's letter no. TP-MT015/43(FC010/43) dated 1 February
2000
3.Information Disclosed on Cross-related Transaction as
Required by SET as of 2 February 2000
4.SET's letter no. BJ.218/2543 dated 14 February 2000
Enclosures: 1. Asset appraisal reports by Independent Price Appraiser, 4
copies
2. Study report on cost outlays and price appraisal in moving the
factory
3. Opinion reports of 2 Independent Financial Advisors, 3 copies
Referring to SET's request to Thantawan Industry Public Co.,Ltd.
(THIP) for notifying more detailed rationale in quoting selling prices of land
plot with building and those vacant land plots for total price of Baht 85.0
million accordingly, THIP therefore is pleased to clarify additional details of
purchasing and selling of these land plots together with the cross-related
transaction involved for SET's consideration as followings:
Details of cross-related transaction between THIP and Sunflower
Enterprise Co.,Ltd. (SE)
1. The big land plot incurring cross-related transaction in this case
having total areas of 20 rai 3 ngarn and 4 sq.wa. in which the land title deeds
separately belong to two companies. The first plot's title having total area of 16
rai 2 ngarn and 29 sq.wa. belongs to SE and has a building of 3,700 sq.m.
erected on the land plot. The second plot's title where the factory situated
having total areas of 4 rai and 75 wa. belongs to THIP.
2. THIP has utilized for its business operation benefits on the land plot
and building which belong to SE by entering into the building rental agreement
ONLY (agreement dated 2 January 1994 and addendums dated 22 July 1994
and 25 September 1995). This building rental agreement term had expired on
31 December 1999.
3. THIP had built 2 factory buildings having total size of 750 sq.m. on
the land plot belonged to SE due to its necessity of factory expansion for the
business growth and production process improvement to meet ISO 9002 quality
standard.
4. THIP has another 2 land plots and buildings located in the adjacent
area where the first plot has been utilized as drinking straw factory (title deeds
no. 24403 and 45445 having total area of 1-3-4 rai) and the second plot has
been utilized as reclosable zip bag factory (title deeds no. 24405 and 57373
having total area of 1-2-35 rai).
5. In 1997 SE had notified its willingness and intention for selling these
land plots to THIP in accordance with terms and conditions stipulated in the
signed rental agreement. THIP then proceeded by having Simon Lim &
Partners Co.,Ltd. as price appraiser of the land plots which had issued its
appraisal report on 18 December 1997. Furthermore, THIP had appointed
Nava Finance & Securities Pcl. and Nava Finance Pcl. as financial advisor
which had issued its report on 25 December 1997 and 5 June 1998 respectively.
Based upon this transparent procedure, THIP had agreed in purchasing these
land plots with its due consideration of financial available and business
operation necessity situation by purchasing the land with building plot and
other vacant land plots having total areas of 4 rai 1 gnarn and 94 wa. and the
buiding having total area of 3,700 sq.m. with total price of Baht 41.0 million.
THIP paid the first payment of Baht 20.50 million on 29 December 1997.
6. By the virtue of extraordinary meeting of shareholders' resolution,
session 1/2541, held on 22 January 1998, those shareholders having no cross-
related interest in the transaction had voted not up to 3/4 of the quorum to
proceed with the transaction. And the following extraordinary meeting of
shareholders held on 30 June 1998 had also voted not up to 3/4 of the quorum
in proceeding with the transaction.
7. THIP had appointed Year Appraisal Co.,Ltd. for doing a feasibility
study on relocation of the factory premises and relocation investment outlays in
which the report's findings issued on December 1998 had summarized these
following alternatives of action:
1. By cost-wise consideration, the appraiser's opinion was
purchasing SE's assets shall have the lowest cost investment.
2. If THIP considers it has no problem with its financial capacity,
then suggested THIP to purchase the total land plot of 11-1-85 rai which shall
enable for THIP's expansion of production capacity in the future.
3. In consideration of relocation THIP's factory to Amphur
Kabinburin in Prajinburi province may not feasible because of the skyrocketing
costs of investment up at least to Baht 133.0 million when considering and
comparing with current economic and financial conditions.
8. THIP had attempted to undertake various courses of action which will
not adversely affect to its business operation.Later on SE had filed notice to
THIP in claiming for the land plots usage fee payment of those plots having no
signed agreement with the total payment of Baht 24.10 million.
9. There were negotiations in solving the problem of this issue between
SE and THIP to alleviate problem effecting THIP's ongoing business operation
as much as possible. Consequently, the fair exchanging resolution had been
commited to each other as following:
1.THIP had renewed the rental agreement (which later expired on 31
December 1999) and entered into land plot rental agreement legitimately.
2.THIP had received offering commitment of selling the land plots
as previously signed agreement on 29 December 1997 by the same price
quotation for another extended 3 years.
In this regard THIP shall pay compensation for the past 5-6 years land
utilization for total Baht 6.50 million. When comparing with the land rental
price, such compensation was fair and justified by the opinion issued by Thai
Sakura and Finance Securities Co.,Ltd., the financial advisor. THIP also
agreed and allowed SE to keep the money amounting Baht 20.50 million
paid for the first payment of land purchasing as deposit of the land purchasing
agreement with binding condition of not to raise the land price for next 3 years.
10. THIP had been notified from SE that SE has had its necessity to sell
all those land plots. By consideration of all concerned aspects particularly if
there will be interested third party to purchase the land plots where currently
utilized by THIP, that shall adversely affect to THIP's business operation in
which these land plots are still its high priority necessity. Besides THIP had
previously agreed to purchase some of those land plots and in the past 2 years
THIP has had sufficient operational cashflow to purchase the land plots without
affecting the profit of its venture, therefore, the two parties had negotiated the
land price once again by resorting to price appraisal done and issued the report
by Simon Lim & Partners Co.,Ltd. and another report by Chartered Property
Consultants Co.,Ltd. as following table comparison details:
(Unit : Million Baht)
Item Title Area Appraisal Price By New Appraisal Price By
Deed (Rai) Proteam Simon Lim Avg. Chartered Prop. Simon Lim Avg.
No. May 27, 98 Dec.18, 97 Jan.4, 2000 Jan.18, 2000
1. Land & 55727 1-3-94 12.70 14.29 13.50 10.32 7.30 8.81
Building 3,700 sq.m 13.40 11.93 12.67 13.71 12.61 13.16
2. Land 56216 2-2-0 15.00 17.00 16.00 12.00 9.15 10.58
3. Land 87666 4-0-88 27.00 28.90 27.95 21.94 15.36 18.65
4. Land 12369 3-1-30 21.30 23.94 22.62 17.30 12.38 14.84
5. Land 50428 2-2-24 14.30 17.41 15.86 12.30 9.37 10.84
Total 103.70 113.47 108.60 87.57 66.17 76.88
11. Price quoted for purchasing and selling:
The agreement for purchasing and selling prices are divided into two
parts in which the first part has followed the committed agreement and the
memorandum of agreement dated 25 November 1999 as shown in comparison
table below:
(Unit : Million Baht)
Title Appraisal Price Previous Criteria to
Deed Simon Lim Proteam Average Purchasing stipulate purchasing
No. Dec.18, 1997 May 27, 1998 Price Price
55727 14.29 12.70 13.50 14.00 14.00
Building 11.93 13.40 12.67 11.00 11.00
56216 17.00 15.00 16.00 16.00 16.00
Total 43.22 41.10 42.16 41.00 41.00
The second part has followed to the new appraisal price done and issue the
report by aforementioned price appraisers
Title Deed New Appraisal Price Criteria to
No. Simon Lim Chartered Prop. Avg.Price stipulate purchasing
Jan.21, 2000 Jan. 11, 2000 Price
87666 15.36 21.94 18.65
12369 12.38 17.30 14.84
50428 9.37 12.30 10.84
Total 37.11 51.54 44.33 44.00
Rationale for Quotation of Purchasing and Selling Price
THIP and SE has obligation to each other according to the agreement
made on 25 November 1999 to complete the land plot purchasing and selling
deal within 3 years in which they had quoted the selling price and was the same
previous agreement (before new price appraisal done). And for the additional
land purchasing, SE had agreed to sell according to average new appraisal
prices despite of disagreement with the appraisal issued by Simon Lim &
Partners Co.,Ltd. who had under appraised the price below the prevailing
market price. Another significant justification of purchasing these land plots
was that these land were fully developed and ready for THIP's business
operation where fully equipped with needed utility infrastructure having
investment value more than Baht 10 million in which readily available for
immediate usage in operation without wasting time.
Criteria of Fair Price Quotation
The prices of these land plots before economic crisis arisen in 1997 were
appraised at Baht 25,000 - 30,000 per square wa. The appraisal prices in 1997
and 1998 had been appraised under the slump period of economy which had
price levels between Baht 14,000 - 18,000 per square wa. For the lastest
appraisal done, there were rather much difference in price opinion between
Baht 66.17 million and Baht 87.57 million while the Land Department had
announced decline of land price appraisal in general by approximately 20%
which was underprice appraisal than due prevailing market price from the
previous base price. In particular of appraisal price of Baht 66.17 million made
by Simon Lim & Partners Co.,Ltd. which was reduced from its previous
appraisal at Baht 113.47 million on December 1997. Anyhow if considering the
quoted selling price in total scenario amounting Baht 85.0 million, this selling
price is still within the appraisal price range issued by these two independent
price appraisers. And the independent financial advisor has also issued its
opinion that this selling price is suitable and reasonable price with due
justification.
Opinion of the Audit Committee:
Based upon the meeting of Board of Directors, session 1/2543 held on 1
February 2000, in which the whole 3 audit committee members attended the
meeting had questioned about the necessity of these land plots purchasing, the
reasonable and justified price, and the suitability in entering to this cross-
related transaction. In clarification to all questions, THIP's management team
had explained and clarified all details up to satisfaction of the whole audit
committee members which evidenced by the report of independent financial
advisor and the reports issued by 2 independent price appraisers.
Consequently, all 3 audit committee members then agreed with this transaction
and approved the entering into these 3 cross-related transactions as proposed by
the company management with following resolution:
1. The compensation payment for damage amounting Baht 6.50 million
and the renting of land with building and vacant land plots at rental price of
Baht 8.35 million per annum.
2. The memorandum of agreement confirming the selling price of land
and building within 3 years.
3. The purchasing of land with building and vacant land plots totally 5
plots having total areas of 14-2-36 rai with total price amounting Baht 85.0
million.
Please be informed accordingly.
Very truly yours,
(Mr.Thaveewat Yinatsawaphan) (Mr.Huang Kuan Chiun)
Director Director